71-Year Old California Man Accused of $20 Million Ponzi Scheme

A California man has been arrested and charged with operating a Ponzi scheme that duped victims, mostly elderly, out of at least $20 million.  Aldo Joseph Baccala, 71, of Petaluma, California, was arrested Tuesday and charged with 131 counts of untrue statements/omissions in the sale of a security, 24 counts of grand theft, 8 counts of elder financial abuse, and 1 count of securities fraud.  He was also charged with several sentencing enhancements relating to the amount of money allegedly stolen.  The arrest is the culmination of a three-year investigation, which began after a group of investors brought a civil lawsuit against Baccala after the scheme allegedly unraveled in late 2008.  If convicted of all charges, Baccala faces hundreds of years in prison.

According to authorities, Baccala owned and operated Baccala Realty, Inc.  From 2003 to 2008, Baccala solicited potential investors, many of whom were elderly and family friends of Baccala, by promising annual returns exceeding twelve percent in return for investment in one of Baccala's ventures that included assisted living facilities, a car wash, and other businesses.  Potential investors were assured that each project was secured by a first or second deed of trust on the property.  However, in reality, no deed of trust was ever recorded.  Instead, Baccala used the more than $20 million raised to make speculative bets in the stock market, which yielded losses of at least $8 million from 2003 to 2008.  Additionally, investor funds were used to make purported interest payments to existing investors.  As Baccala's losses grew, he continued to solicit new investors, offering increased rates of return of up to 27.5%.  

In November 2008, after investors were told that Baccala would no longer be making monthly payments, a group of investors sued Baccala.  According to news reports, that lawsuit settled, with Baccala promising to make payments of $22 million to the plaintiffs "when the real estate market rebounds."  

A copy of the criminal complaint is here.

$157 Million Ponzi Scheme Uncovered in China?

Several news outlets are reporting that a Chinese shopping website may have been outed last week as a Ponzi scheme, with the number of victims estimated in the hundreds of thousands and rumors that the founder had skipped town along with senior executives and the bulk of investor funds.  While Yao Jianqing, the alleged mastermind of the scheme, was arrested last Thursday, there has been no word on the approximately $157 million of investor funds said to me missing.  While much remains unknown about the purported fraud, rumors that the Chinese government was preparing to investigate and freeze bank accounts prompted an apparent run on several large Chinese banks in the city of Wuyishan.

According to limited details that have come out of China, Jianqing established the website bfbfl.com (which has since been shut down), which established an online shopping site, in addition to selling items, solicited money from potential investors with promises that they could expect to recoup their original investment in as little as 100 days and make a profit within 400 days.  The "rebate mall", as it has been referred to, was extremely popular in China, with estimates that over 200,000 individuals were solicited over 23 provinces in China. After holding several meetings in early May to solicit new members, the company apparently shut its doors and its executives fled town.  As news of the possible fraud spread, it was reported that many investors ransacked and apparently destroyed the company's offices in Fuzhou.  

More as details emerge.

SEC Charges California Fund Manager With $60 Million Ponzi Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed charges against a northern California investment advisor, alleging he operated a Ponzi scheme that took in more than $60 million from investors.  John Geringer, 47, along with several entities he operated, was charged with violations of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Investment Advisors Act of 1940.  The SEC is seeking disgorgement of all ill-gotten proceeds of the scheme, civil monetary penalties, and injunctive relief barring future violations.

Geringer operated the GLR Growth Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), along with GLR Capital Management, LLC ("GLR Capital"), which acted as the Fund's general partner, and GLR Advisors, LLC ("GLR Advisors"), which acted as investment advisor to the Fund.  Beginning no later than 2005, Geringer solicited individuals to invest in the Fund by claiming that the Fund consistently achieved annual returns during the time period of 2001 to 2011 ranging from 17% to 25%, including a return of 24% in 2008 when the S&P 500 lost 38.5%.  However, the Fund itself did not even exist until 2003.  Prospective investors were told that the Fund achieved these returns simply by investing in investments tied to major market indices, as well as technology and commodity-based investments.    Investors were provided with false and misleading market materials that claimed that the Fund invested 75% of its assets in securities tied to major trading indexes, with no more than 25% of assets in public and private oil, gas, and technology companies.  Additionally, Geringer supplied investors with falsified brokerage and tax records that purported to show short-term capital gains.  

In reality, the Fund experienced trading losses every year from 2005 to 2009, including a 33% loss in 2008 and a 92% decline in 2009.  Additionally, rather than invest in publicly traded securities, the Fund instead invested nearly $30 million, or half of the total funds raised from investors, in two private startup technology companies that were highly illiquid.  By mid-2009, the Fund had stopped trading entirely after suffering massive losses. With no trading returns to pay to investors, Geringer instead used funds contributed by existing investors to create the false appearance that the Fund was profitable.  

Geringer also included the representation on periodic account statements that the Fund was "MEMBER NASD AND SEC APPROVED".  According to the SEC, neither of these claims were true, and the SEC does not 'approve' funds or investments in funds.

A copy of the SEC's complaint is here.  

Florida Man Sentenced to Eight Years for $8 Million Ponzi Scheme

A Virginia federal judge handed down an eight-year prison sentence to a Florida man who duped hundreds of investors out of over $8 million.  Stanley Shew-A-Tjon, 62, of Davie, Florida, previously pled guilty to one count of securities fraud, which carries a maximum potential sentence of up to twenty-five years in prison.  The sentence, imposed by United States District Court Judge James Cacheris, was closer to the defense's request of seven years than the sixteen year requested by prosecutors.  

Beginning in July 2005, Shew-A-Tjon began soliciting individuals to invest in a range of investment opportunities, including gold, foreign currency, and private placements.  Potential investors were told that they could expect an exorbitant rate of return that often ranged from 5% to 18% per month.  Based on these representations, Shew-A-Tjon was able to raise over $16 million from approximately 900 investors.  Investors were then provided with account statements purporting to show legitimate returns and authenticate the scheme's legitimacy.  However, investors were not told that most, if not all, of these "returns" instead consisted of the funds of existing investors.  Authorities estimated that the total loss from the scheme, which continued until January 2008, exceeded $8 million.  

Shew-A-Tjon's attorney estimated that victims stand to recover approximately $3 million of their losses, or approximately 37.5%.  


SEC Charges Two Men With $163 Million Timeshare Ponzi Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filed a civil enforcement action against two individuals, accusing them of operating a $163 million Ponzi scheme by purporting to sell interests in two Dominican Republic timeshare resorts.  James B. Catledge, of San Diego, California, and Derek F. C. Elliott, of Hillsburgh, Ontario, were charged in Nevada federal court with multiple violations of federal securities laws in connection with the scheme.  The SEC is seeking injunctive relief, disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains, and civil monetary penalties.  

According to the SEC, Elliott and his father purchased the Cofresi resort in the Dominican Republic in 2003 through their company EMI Sun Village, Inc. ("EMI Sun Village"), with the intent to finish construction and open the resort for business.  However, after encountering financial difficulties, a friend urged them to get in touch with Catledge, whose company Net Worth Solutions ("Net Worth") could assist with marketing and fund-raising.  After hiring Catledge, Elliott began selling securities related to the Cofresi resort through EMI Sun Village.  This form of security, known as the "Residence", offered a prospective purchaser the right to either occupy a room at the Cofresi resort for a period of time proportional to his investment, or to decline the use of the room and instead allow the unit to be rented out in return for an annual non-use fee ("NUF").  The NUF ranged from 8% to 12%, and was paid out quarterly.  After a five-year period, investors were given the option of either having their principal returned or rolling it over for another five years at a higher NUF.  Investors were assured that their investment was guaranteed, and that they would share in the appreciation of the value of the timeshare itself over time.  

While the Cofrisi resort was still in the process of being "constructed", Elliott and his father purchased another hotel in the Dominican Republic called the Sun Village Juan Dolio ("Sun Village").  While he initially sold interests based on the "Residence" interest marketed in the Cofrisi resort, Elliott began offering a new form of investment known as the "Passport" that promised investors a fractional ownership interest rather than a timeshare.  Instead of a NUF, a prospective investor was promised a 5% annual return, paid quarterly, until the Sun Village was opened.  After the hotel opened, the investor would then be entitled to split the net rental proceeds with the hotel.  An investor purchasing a Passport interest would make half of their investment in cash and half by promissory note.  

Net Worth had exclusive marketing rights to sell both the Passport and Residence interests.  Prospective investors were shown elaborate visual presentations with titles such as "Real Estate Secrets of the Wealthy" to convince people to invest their savings in the Residence and Passport securities.  These presentations were shown at road shows conducted throughout the western United States.  Overall, nearly 1,200 investors purchased $72.6 million worht of investments in Cofresi and $91.2 million in Sun Village, for a total investment of nearly $164 million.  However, investors were not told that the proceeds from these investments would be used for a variety of reasons, and only a small percentage would go towards construction.  For example, out of the $91.2 million raised from Sun Village investors, only $8 million was spent on construction.  The majority of the remainder, nearly $38 million, was used to pay "commissions" to existing investors.  Similarly, over $21 million of the $72.6 million raised from Cofresi investors was used to fund the payment of commissions to investors.  These commissions, totaling nearly $60 million, continued to be paid out despite the fact that both Cofresi and Sun Village experienced yearly operating losses that eventually culminated in the loss of both properties to foreclosure in 2009.  

Elliott and Catledge made numerous misrepresentations and omissions to investors, according to the SEC's complaint.  This included promises that the returns would be guaranteed, that both resorts were profitable, and that "100% of invested capital goes to work for the owner."  Instead, Sun Village investor funds were used for a variety of non-construction expenses, including funding the purchase of a yacht, to pay expenses of the Cofresi resort, and to purchase an additional property.  Sun Village funds were also used to pay NUFs to Cofresi investors - the hallmark of a Ponzi scheme.  Additionally, by failing to register the Passport and Residence securities that were being solicited to prospective investors, the SEC contended that the offerings and resulting misappropriation of offering proceeds were in violation of federal securities laws.

After the Idaho Department of Finance began investigating the scheme in 2005, Catledge and Elliott entered into a consent decree in 2007 that included the promise that they would make a rescission offer to all Idaho purchasers.  However, this rescission offer was never made, and in 2009, the state of Idaho attorney general filed charges against the pair, alleging that they had violated Idaho securities laws by engaging in the sale of unregistered securities.  

According to the Globe and Mail, Mr. Elliott has since launched a new luxury vacation rental website called Preferred Escapes.

The SEC complaint is here.