Ponzi Schemer Who Duped Travis Kelce Caught Hiring Political Consultant To Generate News Stories And Influence Sentencing Judge

A convicted Ponzi schemer who counted Kansas City Chiefs football player Travis Kelce among his victims had his plot to decrease his prison sentence foiled when the FBI discovered that he had hired a prominent political consultant under a $10,000 agreement to generate favorable news coverage and support letters - including a letter from a sitting U.S. Congressman ‘acting in his personal capacity’ - designed to influence the federal judge deciding his fate. The plot appears to have spectacularly backfired, as U.S. District Judge Zachary M. Bluestone rejected the four-year sentence pushed by convicted Ponzi schemer Siddharth Jawahar (and the Congressman ‘acting in his personal capacity’) in favor of an 11-year term.

A $35 Million Ponzi Scheme

According to prosecutors, Jawahar solicited funds through his Texas-based investment company, Swiftarc Capital LLC, by telling investors that their funds would be placed in specific companies. Client funds were initially invested across a diversified portfolio of securities, but beginning in 2015 Jawahar increasingly concentrated investor money in shares of Philip Morris Pakistan, commonly referred to as “PMP.” Eventually, prosecutors said, an extraordinary 99% of client funds were concentrated in the single Pakistani tobacco-company investment.

The value of that concentrated position declined, but Jawahar allegedly concealed those losses rather than reporting them to investors and also represented to investors that their investments were profitable when they were not. According to prosecutors, the resulting Ponzi scheme operated from approximately July 2016 through December 2023. During that period, Jawahar raised more than $35 million from Swiftarc investors but spent only approximately $10 million actually investing in companies. The remainder was used in part to make payments to earlier investors with money obtained from newer investors and to finance Jawahar's lifestyle, including private-plane travel, luxury hotels and apartments in Austin and New York City, private-club memberships, clothing purchases and expensive restaurant outings.

In June 2022, the Texas State Securities Board revoked Swiftarc Capital's authority to conduct investment-advisory activities and ordered Jawahar to cease and desist “from engaging in fraud.” According to the later indictment, Jawahar did not tell investors about the order and continued soliciting money. Prosecutors alleged that one investor provided another $1 million just weeks after the Texas regulator's order. The scheme continued until approximately December 2023 when Jawahar was indicted and charged with three counts of wire fraud and one count of investment adviser fraud. Jawahar was arrested by the FBI in Miami on January 8, 2024.

Jawahar initially fought the charges, but he later agreed to plead guilty to all three wire-fraud counts. The government calculated investor losses at more than $25 million, but in advance of sentencing in September 2026 claimed that Jawahar took in more than $35 million from Swiftarc investors between 2016 and 2023 but actually invested only about $10 million. One of those investors has been publicly identified as Kansas City Chiefs football player Travis Kelce, alhough his investment amount or loss has not been publicly disclosed. In addition to his 11-year sentence, Jawahar was also ordered to pay $31.35 million in restitution.

A $10,000 Public Relations Campaign To “Influence The Judge”

In a last-minute surprise filing from the U.S. Attorney’s Office the day before Jawahar’s sentencing, prosecutors notified Judge Bluestone that the FBI had discovered an agreement between Jawahar and Axiom Strategies, a political consulting firm, that called for Jawahar to pay $10,000 for services that included assistance obtaining favorable media coverage and coordinating letters supporting Jawahar at sentencing. Prosecutors characterized the arrangement as specifically designed to influence the court. The filing not only provided the agreement, but also supplied a transcript of a recorded jail call between Jawahar and the consulting firm in which the two discussed the favorable newspaper article, obtaining a political support letter and the possibility of spending additional money to specifically “geofence” the article to Judge Bluestone's home. During the call, Jawahar himself explained that part of the article's purpose was “to influence the judge.”

The five-page agreement filed with the court shows that Jawahar's impending sentencing was central to the engagement. Axiom was retained to provide “strategic communications, reputation management, public relations, advocacy, and related strategic consulting services” in connection with Jawahar's legal proceedings, mitigation, sentencing and post-sentencing efforts. The stated purpose included presenting Jawahar's background, charitable history, rehabilitation and mitigating circumstances to media, governmental and public-policy audiences.

More specifically, Axiom agreed to use “commercially reasonable efforts” to assist in obtaining approximately one or two advocacy-oriented articles, opinion pieces, interviews or comparable media placements. The firm also agreed to assist with developing and coordinating approximately one or two advocacy or support letters for consideration at Jawahar's sentencing. The agreement even contemplated future assistance with an application for executive clemency or a presidential pardon, including potential outreach to the White House or Office of the Pardon Attorney.

Prosecutors took Jawahar to task for the effort, arguing that the act of spending thousands of dollars trying to influence his sentence rather than repay the people he defrauded demonstrated the need for additional deterrence. While Jawahar's attorney later told the court that Jawahar never actually paid Roe, it does not appear that Judge Bluestone was influenced by that clarification.

A Fawning Newspaper Profile, A Congressman's Letter, And A Recorded Jail Call

The Missouri Independent news outlet did a fantastic job of trying to identify the results of Jawahar’s agreement. Its investigation highlighted a lengthy and decidedly favorable profile of Jawahar published by the Jefferson City News Tribune just four days after the agreement entitled Beyond the Concrete Walls: Sid Jawahar, Redemption, and the Radical Work of Rebuilding Lives from the Inside Out. Prosecutors were quick to point out that the article omitted a rather significant fact: there was not a “single reference” to the years-long fraud scheme for which Jawahar was awaiting sentencing. Instead, the article portrayed Jawahar as a philanthropist and jailhouse educator whose work had transformed the lives of fellow detainees. Officials at the his detention facility later disputed that claim, telling a local TV station that no inmate, including Jawahar, had ever started an educational program at the facility. The article was later edited to remove several passages concerning Jawahar's purported activities at the jail along with the addition of a publisher's note explaining that references to work he “may have done while in jail” had been removed.

Less than a week after the article appeared, Missouri Congressman Sam Graves submitted a letter on congressional letterhead (but written in his “personal capacity”) urging Judge Bluestone to sentence Jawahar to 48 months in prison, the same four-year sentence Jawahar's own attorneys were asking the court to impose.

But it was the FBI’s recorded jail call that may have been most illustrative - and damaging to Jawahar’s efforts. During the August 31 call, Jawahar asked for an update on what he called the “Senator letter” and was told that “it's gonna be someone good.” The newspaper article was also discussed; Jawahar relayed that someone close to him had warned him to be cautious about the article and suggested running it after sentencing. However, Jawahar was then informed that the article had already run and it was discussed whether the consultant would “ put a little money around it and geofence his house and so he'll see it unless you don't want me to do that.” Ultimately, the consultant hypothesized that “I can't imagine good news backfires.”

The FBI Finds Out

But, good news did backfire. While the government's September 14 filing does not reveal its methods, it indicated that the FBI had “just discovered” the August 24 agreement and had also “recently discovered” the recorded August 31 jail call that Jawahar placed using another inmate's account. Both the consulting firm agreement and jail phone call transcript were included with the filing.

Judge Bluestone then rejected the requested four-year sentence and sentenced Jawahar to 11 years in federal prison, nearly three times the prison term Jawahar and Graves had urged. Bluestone also ordered Jawahar to pay $31.35 million in restitution. The judge cited the “enormous” investor losses, the lengthy duration of the fraud and Jawahar's failure to begin repaying his victims as significant factors in determining the sentence. And, to cap things off, Judge Bluestone reportedly disclosed at sentencing that he never saw the article at all.

A copy of the Government’s September 14th motion, including the consulting firm agreement and jail phone transcript, is here.

President Biden Grants Clemency To At Least Five Convicted Ponzi Schemers

President Biden made headlines earlier this week when he announced he had granted clemency to nearly 1,500 people – an act the White House described as the largest single-day act of clemency in history.  In making the announcement, the White House announced that the President was commuting the sentences of nearly 1,500 individuals who “were placed on home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic” and have “shown successful rehabilitation and a strong commitment to making their communities safer.”  Yet, while the announcement details the steps at rehabilitation taken by those 39 individuals receiving full pardons, only the name and former inmate registry number was provided for the 1,499 individuals whose sentence was commuted.   

As the public has been left to investigate the underlying conduct of those who had their sentences commuted, it has emerged that those receiving clemency include at least five convicted Ponzi schemers whose schemes collectively raised nearly $750 million from thousands of defrauded investors that ultimately resulted in total losses in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Specifically, President Biden commuted the sentences of the following individuals:

  • Timothy McGinn: Sentenced to 15-year term in August 2013 after being convicted at trial for what prosecutors claimed was a Ponzi scheme that caused $130 million in losses and was “the largest financial crime in the history of the upstate New York federal court.” The SEC later sued 10 agents of McGinn’s firm for ignoring red flags in selling the unregistered securities to customers.

  • Marc Dreier - Sentenced to 20-year term in July 2009 after pleading guilty to allegations that his law firm, Dreier LLP, caused roughly $400 million in losses by selling fraudulent promissory notes.  U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff, who sentenced Dreier, observed that “When you turn to the facts of the crime that Mr. Dreier committed, one must be appalled.” 

  • Gregory McKnight – Sentenced to 15-year term in August 2013 after pleading guilty to $72 million Ponzi scheme that promised thousands of investors monthly returns of at least 15%. 

  • Brian Callahan – Sentenced to 12-year term in September 2017 after pleading guilty to $96 million Ponzi scheme in which he operated four investment funds as a “large-scale Ponzi scheme.” 

  • Andrew Mackey – Sentenced to 27-year term after he and his common-law wife were convicted of running a $12 million Ponzi scheme in which they purported to profit from private and confidential offshore business deals.  At the time, the U.S. Attorney remarked that Mackey’s sentence was the “longest imposed in this district for a case of this type.”  The FBI similarly remarked that the sentence “reflect[ed] the damage done to the victim investors.” Oddly, it does not appear that Mackey’s common-law wife, who received a 14-year term, had her sentence commuted.

This is not the first known instance of a convicted Ponzi schemer being granted clemency; President Trump previously commuted the sentence of Eliyahu Weinstein in the last days of his initial term after Weinstein had served 8 years of a 24-year sentence for his role in a $200 million Ponzi scheme.  Weinstein, ironically, was arrested last year along with four others and accused of running a $35 million “Ponzi-like” scheme.

However, it is the number and severity of those convicted Ponzi schemers receiving clemency from President Biden that is raising eyebrows.  Collectively, the five Ponzi schemers receiving commutation were involved in raising nearly $750 million from thousands of duped investors – many of whom suffered a loss of at least some of their investment for their misplaced trust. 

The President’s wielding of clemency power can be a powerful and profound tool often aimed at righting previous wrongs. Indeed, I was one of the many volunteers in President Obama’s Clemency Initiative that sought to rectify sentencing disparities handed down to non-violent drug offenders in the 1980s; one of the highlights of my career was receiving a call from President Obama’s Office of the Pardon Attorney informing me that one of my client’s life sentence had been commuted.  That client had served nearly 25 years in federal prison for non-violent drug offenses and they would have likely been sentenced to a much lower term had they been sentenced today due to changes in sentencing laws and guidelines.

Absent additional justification or explanation from the White House, which is not expected given that the decisions are not subject to oversight or appeal, it is hard to understand a similar justification for those convicted of running massive Ponzi schemes that defrauded and victimized innocent investors.  One could certainly argue that Mackey’s 27-year term was lengthy for “only” running a $12 million Ponzi scheme, but it is likely still within the sentencing guidelines used today given the loss amount.  Conversely, the non-violent drug offenders that received clemency were able to demonstrate that the current sentencing guidelines would have resulted in a much-lower sentence.  I previously spent over 10 years representing Court-appointed Receivers tasked with recovering assets for those victimized by Ponzi schemers, and I can say first-hand that the harm inflicted on many of these victims was devastating and permanent.  Many lost everything and their lives were irreparably changed to their detriment and without any of their own fault.