Most Recent
AdSurfDaily Agape agent American Integrity Aronson asset sales Attorney av bar reg baker bank bank of america Bankruptcy baumann bermudez black diamond blackwell bridge loan bull cattle CD celebrity cftc charity china China Voice church cityfund claims claims process clawback commission commodities commodity pool computer program congress Crown Forex currency death sentence denver diamond bar disgorgement Distribution Dodd-Frank donnan Dreier dunhill e-bullion elderly E-M Management SEC england Fairfield family FBI FDIC Fees female ponzi scheme financial advisor fine FINRA football forex fraud fufta fugitive Full Tilt gift card guilty plea GunnAllen hawaii Heckscher HSBC india invers forex janvey John Morgan JP Morgan kansas ken bell kenzie las vegas lawsuit lawyer libya Lifland machado Madoff Marian Morgan metro dream homes mets milberg millers a game Morgan European Holdings mortgage multiple schemes NCAA Net Winner new jersey notes objection Oxford Patrick Kiley paul burks PermaPave Pettengill Petters Picard poker Ponzi ponzi scheme ponzi scheme database ponzi scheme list Prime Rate profitable sunrise prosun pta puerto rico Rakoff real estate receiver receivership regulation relief defendants religion remission repeat offender restitution Rothstein RRA sec sentencing simmons sipa sipc snelling standing stanford stettin subpoena td bank telexfree treasury bonds treasury strip Tremont Trevor Cook UBS UFTA uga utah venture advisors Wachovia wilpon wire fraud woman zeek zeek rewards zeekler zeekrewards
Recent SEC Releases
« Wife Of Fugitive Accused Of $1 Billion Ponzi Scheme Arrested Trying To Board Brazil-Bound Plane | Main | Madoff Fund Receives 50,000 Claims Seeking $40 Billion In Losses »

Court Dismisses SEC's $300 Million Ponzi Case On Timeliness Grounds

A Florida federal judge ordered the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission accusing five former real estate executives of masterminding a $300 million Ponzi scheme on the basis that regulators waited too long to file the case.  U.S. District Judge James King granted a motion to dismiss brought by executives of the now-defunct Cay Clubs, agreeing that the SEC "failed to meet its serious duty to timely bring this enforcement action."  The Commission filed the lawsuit in January 2013, alleging that Cay Clubs ultimately raised more than $300 million from nearly 1,400 investors worldwide.  

According to the Commission's lawsuit, defendants Fred Davis Clark, David Schwarz, Cristal Coleman, Barry Graham and Ricky Lynn Stokes touted the above-average returns available by purchasing units at Cay Club resort locations, including a guaranteed 15% return and a future income stream from the rental of those units.  However, rather than use investor funds as promised, the Commission accused defendants of using investor deposits to pay returns to existing investors as well as diverting more than $30 million for the payment of salaries and bonuses and even the funding of a liquor distillery.  The scheme later collapsed and ceased operations.

In his ruling, King faulted the Commission for failing to timely bring claims against defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2462 ("Section 2462").  Section 2462 requires that an action for enforcement of any civil fine or forfeiture must be brought within five years from the date the claim first accrued.  Here, because the Commission filed its action on January 30, 2013, the last act committed by each defendant had to have occurred on January 30, 2008 or later.  However, Judge King found that "rather than expeditiously, or even promptly, bringing an enforcement action against the alleged fraudsters and peddlers of unregistered securities, the SEC waited."  

Despite beginning an investigation in late 2007, and alleging in its complaint that Cay Clubs' business activities continued until at least July 2008, Judge King found that the Commission had failed to point to any evidence that any act of offering or sale of alleged securities occurred after January 30, 2008.  Indeed, at least two of the defendants testified that their relationship with Cay Cliubs ended in October 2007.  

While orders of dismissal are typically done "without prejudice," meaning that the plaintiff is given another change to file an amended complaint seeking to rectify the deficiencies, Judge King entered his order "with prejudice" that will effectively end the case.  The Commission has not yet issued any comment, although it is likely an appeal will follow.  

The Order is below:

Final Order of Dismissal


PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (1)

Merrill still in jail hehehehhehehehe

May 16, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterP.hunter

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>