Most Recent
AdSurfDaily Agape agent American Integrity Aronson asset sales Attorney av bar reg baker bank bank of america Bankruptcy baumann bermudez black diamond blackwell bridge loan bull cattle CD celebrity cftc charity china China Voice church cityfund claims claims process clawback commission commodities commodity pool computer program congress Crown Forex currency death sentence denver diamond bar disgorgement Distribution Dodd-Frank donnan Dreier dunhill e-bullion elderly E-M Management SEC england Fairfield family FBI FDIC Fees female ponzi scheme financial advisor fine FINRA football forex fraud fufta fugitive Full Tilt gift card guilty plea GunnAllen hawaii Heckscher HSBC india invers forex janvey John Morgan JP Morgan kansas ken bell kenzie las vegas lawsuit lawyer libya Lifland machado Madoff Marian Morgan metro dream homes mets milberg millers a game Morgan European Holdings mortgage multiple schemes NCAA Net Winner new jersey notes objection Oxford Patrick Kiley paul burks PermaPave Pettengill Petters Picard poker Ponzi ponzi scheme ponzi scheme database ponzi scheme list Prime Rate profitable sunrise prosun pta puerto rico Rakoff real estate receiver receivership regulation relief defendants religion remission repeat offender restitution Rothstein RRA sec sentencing simmons sipa sipc snelling standing stanford stettin subpoena td bank telexfree treasury bonds treasury strip Tremont Trevor Cook UBS UFTA uga utah venture advisors Wachovia wilpon wire fraud woman zeek zeek rewards zeekler zeekrewards
Recent SEC Releases
« Texas Attorney Indicted for Running $2.8 Million Ponzi Scheme | Main | Clerical Error Results in Overpaid Investors Being Asked to Return Excess Distributions »

Stanford Judge OK's Claims Process; Victims Have Until September 1 to File Proof of Claim

A federal judge has approved a request to establish a claims process for victims of R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, paving the way for victims to recoup some of their losses since Stanford's scheme was uncovered in February 2009.  The court-appointed receiver, Ralph Janvey, had initially filed papers seeking to establish a claims process in late 2011. At that time, Janvey indicated that the Receivership currently had approximately $114.5 million in cash on hand, which would represent a fractional return to investors.  While the establishment of a claims process is a significant step towards returning money to investors, it could still be months or even years before a first distribution could be sent out.

With the ruling of United States District Judge David Godbey, victims must submit a completed Proof of Claim form by September 1, 2012.  The Receivership established a website,, which contains instructions pertaining to the process and provides a downloadable Proof of Claim form here.  Victims who have already filed a claim in connection with the Antiguan liquidation proceeding must still file a Proof of Claim to preserve their right to any return of funds recovered by the U.S. Receivership.

A review of the Proof of Claim form suggests that the Receivership's financial records relating to the scheme may be incomplete or lacking.  For example, investors are asked to detail each deposit they made with Stanford, along with any withdrawal they made before the scheme was uncovered.  This information is required to calculate an investor's "net investment amount" that is in turn used to determine an investor's allowed claim. In other schemes where this information is available to the Receiver, investors have often been given the Receiver's determination of their "net investment amount" in the initial proof of claim form and then asked whether the investor is in agreement with that calculation.  If so, additional information is usually unneeded.  However, if an investor disagrees with the Receiver's calculation, documentation supporting the investor's figure is then requested.  

While the Receiver may simply be seeking verification of already-calculated figures, this could also suggest that records of investor contributions/withdrawals may be incomplete or lacking.  Moreover, investors are required to submit documentation supporting their claim calculation, or provide an explanation for its absence.  Inevitably, some investors may not have kept meticulous records of their investment activity, which could complicate the process to calculate the claim amount.  

Investors expecting to see a distribution check soon could be disappointed.  The time between the close of the claims process and the issuance of distribution checks could be lengthy, especially considering that Janvey and his team will be combing through large amounts of supporting documentation.  Additionally, many investors will be asked to address discrepancies or omissions in their initial proof of claim form, which can take time.  Once all claims are received, the Receiver must then make determinations whether to allow or deny each claim.  Following this, the Receiver must obtain court approval of his determinations, and an objection period is typical to allow investors with a denied claim an opportunity to contest that determination.  Finally, the Receiver will seek court approval to make a first distribution.  In short, a distribution in 2012 seems unlikely.  

The website established for investors to file a claim is here.  Investors may file their Proof of Claim electronically on the website, or submit their completed Proof of Claim form by mail, fax, or email.  

The Proof of Claim Form is available here.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>