Most Recent
AdSurfDaily Agape agent American Integrity Aronson asset sales Attorney av bar reg baker bank bank of america Bankruptcy baumann bermudez black diamond blackwell bridge loan bull cattle CD celebrity cftc charity china China Voice church cityfund claims claims process clawback commission commodities commodity pool computer program congress Crown Forex currency death sentence denver diamond bar disgorgement Distribution Dodd-Frank donnan Dreier dunhill e-bullion elderly E-M Management SEC england Fairfield family FBI FDIC Fees female ponzi scheme financial advisor fine FINRA football forex fraud fufta fugitive Full Tilt gift card guilty plea GunnAllen hawaii Heckscher HSBC india invers forex janvey John Morgan JP Morgan kansas ken bell kenzie las vegas lawsuit lawyer libya Lifland machado Madoff Marian Morgan metro dream homes mets milberg millers a game Morgan European Holdings mortgage multiple schemes NCAA Net Winner new jersey notes objection Oxford Patrick Kiley paul burks PermaPave Pettengill Petters Picard poker Ponzi ponzi scheme ponzi scheme database ponzi scheme list Prime Rate profitable sunrise prosun pta puerto rico Rakoff real estate receiver receivership regulation relief defendants religion remission repeat offender restitution Rothstein RRA sec sentencing simmons sipa sipc snelling standing stanford stettin subpoena td bank telexfree treasury bonds treasury strip Tremont Trevor Cook UBS UFTA uga utah venture advisors Wachovia wilpon wire fraud woman zeek zeek rewards zeekler zeekrewards
Recent SEC Releases
« Civil Prosecution of Ponzi Schemer That Committed Suicide Pays Off As Investors Set to Receive $9 Million | Main | Zeek Rewards Update: Subpoenas Challenged, Affiliates Want 'Examiner' Appointed (And Paid) By Receivership »

Report: Allen Stanford Used Prominent Investigative Firm To Collect Dirt On Critics

A fascinating report by McClatchy Newspapers has alleged that R. Allen Stanford, who earlier this year was convicted of masterminding the second-largest Ponzi scheme in United States history, retained a prominent investigative firm to silence potential critics in the face of mounting skepticism over the legitimacy of his scheme. Ironically, the investigative firm, Kroll Inc., has recently emerged in the public spotlight after the New York Times reported on the company's audit finding that Afghanistan's Kabul Bank started out as a massive Ponzi scheme. However, in Stanford's case, Kroll was retained to investigate investors, employees, and even government employees that Stanford considered a threat to the continuing viability of his massive fraud.

According to the report, Stanford used the services of Kroll, which had gained the reputation as Wall Street's 'private eye', extensively since at least 1996 after the newspaper Caribbean Week published an article topenly criticizing Stanford. Tom Cash, a Miami-based Managing Director at Kroll, served as Stanford's main contact, and a trove of email communications obtained by McClatchy detail the extent to which Stanford was both aware of and concerned by those who questioned him. After the article in Caribbean Week, Stanford told Cash to "go for the jugular." Cash responded that he had three people looking into background information on the story's author, and a retraction was later published.

Stanford increasingly sought Kroll's services in the years leading up to the discovery of his elaborate fruad. In 2006, Kroll began digging for dirt on Jonathan Winer, a former State Department senior official who had once been tasked with investigating international money laundering and regulation of offshore banks as part of his job duties as deputy assistant secretary of state for law enforcement. Stanford became convinced Winer was behind a critical 2006 Bloomberg story, telling Cash that

I want an in depth profile, credit history, marriage, kids, work personal quirks.”

Following up one day later, it was apparent that Stanford felt threatened by Winer:

“Do whatever it takes to zero in… I bet you can find a way to get Winer’s divorce decree unsealed. The guy is pure cockroach and he keeps surfacing and saying all this insane BS to whoever will listen.”

By the end of the day, Cash had revealed to Stanford that their investigation had zeroed in on the rumor that Winer's wife was a lesbian. Ultimately, it is unknown as to whether any further action was taken. Stanford also sought Kroll's services in dealing with former Stanford employees who had threatened to talk to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Kroll refused to directly comment on the issue, likely due to potential legal exposure. However, a spokesperson emphasized that Kroll considered itself duped by Stanford, and that none of the individuals from that investigation were currently employed with Kroll. Ironically, Cash's departure from Kroll came after a company client filed a lawsuit resulting from Cash's recommendation to invest with Stanford. That client, National Electronic Contractors Association, invested $2.5 million with Stanford, and later sued Kroll in 2007 for gross negligence alleging that the company failed to disclose it or Cash's relationship with Stanford.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (4)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Report: Allen Stanford Used Prominent Investigative Firm To Collect Dirt On Critics - Ponzitracker - Ponzitracker
  • Response
    Report: Allen Stanford Used Prominent Investigative Firm To Collect Dirt On Critics - Ponzitracker - Ponzitracker
  • Response
    Response: debt collection
    Report: Allen Stanford Used Prominent Investigative Firm To Collect Dirt On Critics - Ponzitracker - Ponzitracker
  • Response
    Report: Allen Stanford Used Prominent Investigative Firm To Collect Dirt On Critics - Ponzitracker - Ponzitracker

Reader Comments (1)

Stanford and the Stanford Group had long since been exposed by Offshore Alert as a dubious if not fraudulent organization. See - the editor David Marchant had been on top of this for a good deal of time before all heck broke loose when larger media outlets confirmed the obvious. But my questions, how can Kroll be so good and still not see the elephant in the board room?

December 4, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterBurke Files

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>